Home / 比較
Coze vs Inworld
Coze edges Inworld on our editorial score (4.3 vs 4.2), but Coze is the stronger pick if you want image sharing, while Inworld fits better if voice notes matter more.
0| Coze0 | Inworld0 | |
|---|---|---|
| 編集スコア | 4.3 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| 価格 | $9/mo | Free |
| 価格帯 | Under $10/mo | Free |
| 無料プラン | あり | あり |
| 価格の詳細 | Free tier (10 credits/day, 3 bots); Premium from $9/mo (Lite) to $39/mo. Open-source Studio for self-hosting. | Free tier (5,000 API interactions/mo, Studio, Unity/Unreal SDK). Pro pay-as-you-go from $0.002/interaction; Creator $25/mo. |
| アダルトコンテンツ | No adult mode | No adult mode |
| 音声 | なし | 音声メッセージ |
| 画像 | あり | なし |
| 動画 | なし | なし |
| 記憶 | あり | あり |
| カスタムキャラクター | あり | あり |
| コンパニオンの種類 | Any character | Any character |
| プラットフォーム | Web | Web |
| ローカル動作 | なし | なし |
Coze — 私たちの見解
Build and ship custom AI chatbots to 8+ channels with plugins and workflows — a create-your-own toolkit, not a fixed companion.
- No-code bot building
- Multi-channel publishing
- Free tier is usable
Inworld — 私たちの見解
A developer platform for personality, memory, emotion and voice — build your own interactive characters for games and apps.
- Deep personality + memory engine
- Unity/Unreal SDKs
- Generous free tier
Coze vs Inworld — よくある質問
Which is cheaper, Coze or Inworld?
Inworld is the cheaper of the two at Free, against $9/mo for Coze.
Which one has a free tier?
Both do — you can try either without paying.
Which remembers conversations better?
Both keep context across sessions. The practical difference is elsewhere: price and platform coverage differ between them.
Which handles adult content differently?
Coze: No adult mode. Inworld: No adult mode. This directory is SFW — we record whether a mature mode exists so you know before signing up, and we describe no explicit material.