Home / 比較
Character.AI vs AI Bestie
Character.AI edges AI Bestie on our editorial score (4.4 vs 3.7), but the two are close on features — Character.AI is cheaper at $7.92/mo (~$0/mo less), so default to it unless you prefer AI Bestie's branding.
0| Character.AI | AI Bestie | |
|---|---|---|
| 編集スコア | 4.4 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| 価格 | $7.92/mo | $8.25/mo |
| 価格帯 | Under $10/mo | Under $10/mo |
| 無料プラン | あり | あり |
| 価格の詳細 | c.ai+ $9.99/mo or $94.99/yr (~$7.92/mo). Free chat is unlimited but carries ads, a daily swipe cap and a Charms currency. A cheaper (c.ai) lite tier exists but its price varies by region. | Free (10 messages + two 2-minute calls); Bestie+ $3.99/week, $9.99/month or $99/year (verified 2026-09-30). Romance stays warm and wholesome, never explicit. |
| アダルトコンテンツ | No adult mode | No adult mode |
| 音声 | ライブ通話 | ライブ通話 |
| 画像 | あり | あり |
| 動画 | なし | なし |
| 記憶 | あり | あり |
| カスタムキャラクター | あり | あり |
| コンパニオンの種類 | Any character | Female companion, Male companion, Any character |
| プラットフォーム | Web, iOS, Android | Web, Android |
| ローカル動作 | なし | なし |
Character.AI — 私たちの見解
The default starting point: unmatched variety and the most generous free tier in the category.
- 20M+ community characters
- Unlimited free text chat
- Best-in-class prose quality
AI Bestie — 私たちの見解
Wholesome multi-persona companion with real voice calls and shared memory across the whole bestie family.
- Real two-way voice calls
- Memory shared across the whole persona family
- 70+ languages
Character.AI vs AI Bestie — よくある質問
Which is cheaper, Character.AI or AI Bestie?
Character.AI is the cheaper of the two at $7.92/mo, against $8.25/mo for AI Bestie.
Which one has a free tier?
Both do — you can try either without paying.
Which remembers conversations better?
Both keep context across sessions. The practical difference is elsewhere: voice support differs between them.
Which handles adult content differently?
Character.AI: No adult mode. AI Bestie: No adult mode. This directory is SFW — we record whether a mature mode exists so you know before signing up, and we describe no explicit material.