Home / 比較
HammerAI vs Inworld
HammerAI edges Inworld on our editorial score (4.2 vs 4.2), but HammerAI is the better fit if you want image sharing; Inworld has no clear edge there.
| HammerAI | Inworld | |
|---|---|---|
| 編集スコア | 4.2 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| 価格 | $9/mo | Free |
| 価格帯 | Under $10/mo | Free |
| 無料プラン | あり | あり |
| 価格の詳細 | Free: 600 cloud messages/day, unlimited chat on locally run models. Pro tiers $9/$18/$35 per month for larger cloud limits. Verified on hammerai.com/pricing. | Free tier (5,000 API interactions/mo, Studio, Unity/Unreal SDK). Pro pay-as-you-go from $0.002/interaction; Creator $25/mo. |
| アダルトコンテンツ | No adult mode | No adult mode |
| 音声 | 音声メッセージ | 音声メッセージ |
| 画像 | あり | なし |
| 動画 | なし | なし |
| 記憶 | あり | あり |
| カスタムキャラクター | あり | あり |
| コンパニオンの種類 | Any character | Any character |
| プラットフォーム | Web, Desktop, iOS | Web |
| ローカル動作 | あり | なし |
HammerAI — 私たちの見解
The most generous free tier in the category: unlimited chat on locally run models, 600 cloud messages a day, no card required.
- Unlimited free chat with local models
- Group chat, lorebooks and personas
- Open-source with desktop apps
Inworld — 私たちの見解
A developer platform for personality, memory, emotion and voice — build your own interactive characters for games and apps.
- Deep personality + memory engine
- Unity/Unreal SDKs
- Generous free tier
HammerAI vs Inworld — よくある質問
Which is cheaper, HammerAI or Inworld?
Inworld is the cheaper of the two at Free, against $9/mo for HammerAI.
Which one has a free tier?
Both do — you can try either without paying.
Which remembers conversations better?
Both keep context across sessions. The practical difference is elsewhere: price and platform coverage differ between them.
Which handles adult content differently?
HammerAI: No adult mode. Inworld: No adult mode. This directory is SFW — we record whether a mature mode exists so you know before signing up, and we describe no explicit material.