Home / 比較
Pi vs Shapes
Pi edges Shapes on our editorial score (4.0 vs 4.0), but Pi is the stronger pick if you want live voice calls, while Shapes fits better if custom characters matter more.
0| Pi0 | Shapes0 | |
|---|---|---|
| 編集スコア | 4.0 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| 価格 | Free | Free |
| 価格帯 | Free | Free |
| 無料プラン | あり | あり |
| 価格の詳細 | Free, with no usage limit and no paid tier — no card required. | Core experience free per shapes.inc (2026-09), including model choice and persistent memory; premium models may exist but are not published. |
| アダルトコンテンツ | No adult mode | No adult mode |
| 音声 | ライブ通話 | なし |
| 画像 | なし | なし |
| 動画 | なし | なし |
| 記憶 | あり | あり |
| カスタムキャラクター | なし | あり |
| コンパニオンの種類 | Any character | Any character |
| プラットフォーム | Web, iOS, Android | Web, Discord, Telegram |
| ローカル動作 | なし | なし |
Pi — 私たちの見解
Completely free, genuinely warm, and no upsell wall. Not a roleplay product, but an excellent listener.
- Entirely free with unlimited voice
- Consistently rated the most empathetic free model
- No ads
Shapes — 私たちの見解
A multiplayer twist: add customizable AI characters to Discord, Telegram or the web with persistent memory, free.
- Lives inside Discord/Telegram
- 300+ model choice on the free tier
- Persistent memory
Pi vs Shapes — よくある質問
Which is cheaper, Pi or Shapes?
They cost the same on our recorded numbers (Free).
Which one has a free tier?
Both do — you can try either without paying.
Which remembers conversations better?
Both keep context across sessions. The practical difference is elsewhere: voice support differs between them.
Which handles adult content differently?
Pi: No adult mode. Shapes: No adult mode. This directory is SFW — we record whether a mature mode exists so you know before signing up, and we describe no explicit material.