Home / 비교
Replika vs JuicyChat.AI
Replika edges JuicyChat.AI on our editorial score (4.1 vs 4.0), but Replika is the stronger pick if you want live voice calls and video, while JuicyChat.AI fits better if voice notes or image sharing matter more.
0| Replika0 | JuicyChat.AI0 | |
|---|---|---|
| 편집 점수 | 4.1 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| 가격 | $5.83/mo | $12.99/mo |
| 가격대 | Under $10/mo | $10–20/mo |
| 무료 플랜 | 예 | 예 |
| 가격 상세 | Pro $19.99/mo or $69.99/yr (~$5.83/mo); Ultra $29.99/mo; a higher tier exists at an unpublished price. Replika does not list prices on its website — they show only in-app and vary by region. | Free tier available. Pro $12.99/mo unlocks higher limits, image and voice generation. (Some regions list Standard $9.99 / Premium $29.99 tiers.) |
| 성인 콘텐츠 | No adult mode | Adult-first |
| 음성 | 라이브 통화 | 음성 메시지 |
| 이미지 | 아니오 | 예 |
| 동영상 | 예 | 아니오 |
| 기억 | 예 | 예 |
| 커스텀 캐릭터 | 예 | 예 |
| 컴패니언 유형 | Female companion, Male companion, Non-binary | Any character |
| 플랫폼 | Web, iOS, Android | Web |
| 로컬 실행 | 아니오 | 아니오 |
Replika — 우리의 견해
Still the strongest product for people who want one companion and a real feeling of continuity.
- Deepest emotional-continuity design
- Voice calls plus AR and avatar video
- Wellbeing features are genuinely useful
JuicyChat.AI — 우리의 견해
An adults-only character-chat app with a large uncensored library, plus image and voice generation and persistent memory.
- Uncensored character library
- Image and voice generation
- Persistent memory
Replika vs JuicyChat.AI — 자주 묻는 질문
Which is cheaper, Replika or JuicyChat.AI?
Replika is the cheaper of the two at $5.83/mo, against $12.99/mo for JuicyChat.AI.
Which one has a free tier?
Both do — you can try either without paying.
Which remembers conversations better?
Both keep context across sessions. The practical difference is elsewhere: voice support differs between them.
Which handles adult content differently?
Replika: No adult mode. JuicyChat.AI: Adult-first. This directory is SFW — we record whether a mature mode exists so you know before signing up, and we describe no explicit material.