Home / 비교
Replika vs Romantic AI
Replika edges Romantic AI on our editorial score (4.1 vs 4.0), but Replika is the stronger pick if you want live voice calls and video, while Romantic AI fits better if image sharing matter more.
0| Replika0 | Romantic AI0 | |
|---|---|---|
| 편집 점수 | 4.1 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| 가격 | $5.83/mo | $3.75/mo |
| 가격대 | Under $10/mo | Under $10/mo |
| 무료 플랜 | 예 | 예 |
| 가격 상세 | Pro $19.99/mo or $69.99/yr (~$5.83/mo); Ultra $29.99/mo; a higher tier exists at an unpublished price. Replika does not list prices on its website — they show only in-app and vary by region. | Basic free. Premium ~$12.99–14.99/mo, or $44.99/yr (~$3.75/mo). Weekly $6.99. Hearts currency billed per image (~15 Hearts/image). |
| 성인 콘텐츠 | No adult mode | Optional mature mode |
| 음성 | 라이브 통화 | 아니오 |
| 이미지 | 아니오 | 예 |
| 동영상 | 예 | 아니오 |
| 기억 | 예 | 예 |
| 커스텀 캐릭터 | 예 | 예 |
| 컴패니언 유형 | Female companion, Male companion, Non-binary | Any character |
| 플랫폼 | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android |
| 로컬 실행 | 아니오 | 아니오 |
Replika — 우리의 견해
Still the strongest product for people who want one companion and a real feeling of continuity.
- Deepest emotional-continuity design
- Voice calls plus AR and avatar video
- Wellbeing features are genuinely useful
Romantic AI — 우리의 견해
A romance-first companion with image generation and an optional mature mode — SFW by default.
- 40+ ready-made romance characters
- Optional mature mode, SFW by default
- Image generation and custom characters
Replika vs Romantic AI — 자주 묻는 질문
Which is cheaper, Replika or Romantic AI?
Romantic AI is the cheaper of the two at $3.75/mo, against $5.83/mo for Replika.
Which one has a free tier?
Both do — you can try either without paying.
Which remembers conversations better?
Both keep context across sessions. The practical difference is elsewhere: voice support differs between them.
Which handles adult content differently?
Replika: No adult mode. Romantic AI: Optional mature mode. This directory is SFW — we record whether a mature mode exists so you know before signing up, and we describe no explicit material.