Home / 비교
SillyTavern vs HuggingChat
SillyTavern edges HuggingChat on our editorial score (4.3 vs 4.1), but SillyTavern is the better fit if you want live voice calls and custom characters; HuggingChat has no clear edge there.
0| SillyTavern0 | HuggingChat0 | |
|---|---|---|
| 편집 점수 | 4.3 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| 가격 | Free | Free |
| 가격대 | Free | Free |
| 무료 플랜 | 예 | 예 |
| 가격 상세 | Free and open source under AGPL-3.0. You pay only for whichever model API you connect. | Free with a Hugging Face account; Hugging Face Pro $9/mo for priority inference. Runs open-weight models (Llama, Qwen, DeepSeek, Mistral…). |
| 성인 콘텐츠 | Optional mature mode | No adult mode |
| 음성 | 라이브 통화 | 아니오 |
| 이미지 | 예 | 예 |
| 동영상 | 아니오 | 아니오 |
| 기억 | 예 | 예 |
| 커스텀 캐릭터 | 예 | 아니오 |
| 컴패니언 유형 | Any character | Any character |
| 플랫폼 | Desktop, Web | Web |
| 로컬 실행 | 예 | 아니오 |
SillyTavern — 우리의 견해
If you want total control and zero subscription, this is where the advanced users live.
- Complete control over prompt and memory
- Works with local or hosted models
- Free forever
HuggingChat — 우리의 견해
Not a companion, but a free, transparent chat front-end over Llama, Qwen, DeepSeek and Mistral that doubles as a daily AI friend.
- Free, no usage cap
- 130+ switchable open models
- Transparent and auditable
SillyTavern vs HuggingChat — 자주 묻는 질문
Which is cheaper, SillyTavern or HuggingChat?
They cost the same on our recorded numbers (Free).
Which one has a free tier?
Both do — you can try either without paying.
Which remembers conversations better?
Both keep context across sessions. The practical difference is elsewhere: voice support differs between them.
Which handles adult content differently?
SillyTavern: Optional mature mode. HuggingChat: No adult mode. This directory is SFW — we record whether a mature mode exists so you know before signing up, and we describe no explicit material.