Home / 비교
SoulChat vs Sesame
SoulChat is the stronger pick if you want voice notes and image sharing and custom characters, while Sesame fits better if live voice calls matter more.
SoulChat — 자사 앱. 무료로 체험할 수 있습니다. 첫 메시지에는 계정이 필요 없습니다.
| SoulChat제공 · 파트너 | Sesame0 | |
|---|---|---|
| 편집 점수 | — | 3.6 / 5 |
| 가격 | $9.99/mo | Free |
| 가격대 | Under $10/mo | Free |
| 무료 플랜 | 예 | 예 |
| 가격 상세 | VIP $9.99/mo, $29.99/quarterly, $119.99/yr — flat, no coins. Free tier: 5 messages before you register, then 25/day. | Free during the research preview, on web and in the mobile app. |
| 성인 콘텐츠 | Optional mature mode | No adult mode |
| 음성 | 음성 메시지 | 라이브 통화 |
| 이미지 | 예 | 아니오 |
| 동영상 | 아니오 | 아니오 |
| 기억 | 예 | 예 |
| 커스텀 캐릭터 | 예 | 아니오 |
| 컴패니언 유형 | Female companion, Any character | Female companion, Male companion, Non-binary |
| 플랫폼 | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android |
| 로컬 실행 | 아니오 | 아니오 |
SoulChat — 우리의 견해
A deliberately hand-authored cast of six rather than a community character library — you trade variety for characters that keep one consistent voice.
- Free tier needs no account at all — 5 messages before you sign up
- Six companions with one fixed voice each, plus your own custom characters
- In-chat selfie generation with a free daily quota, plus group chat with spatial audio
Sesame — 우리의 견해
Started as a voice demo; now a mobile preview of four named agents that still lead the field on presence.
- Best voice presence we have heard
- Free during preview
- Conversational timing is excellent
SoulChat vs Sesame — 자주 묻는 질문
Which is cheaper, SoulChat or Sesame?
Sesame is the cheaper of the two at Free, against $9.99/mo for SoulChat.
Which one has a free tier?
Both do — you can try either without paying.
Which remembers conversations better?
Both keep context across sessions. The practical difference is elsewhere: voice support differs between them.
Which handles adult content differently?
SoulChat: Optional mature mode. Sesame: No adult mode. This directory is SFW — we record whether a mature mode exists so you know before signing up, and we describe no explicit material.