Home / Vergleichen
Coze vs Open WebUI
Coze edges Open WebUI on our editorial score (4.3 vs 4.2), but Open WebUI is the better fit if you want voice notes; Coze has no clear edge there.
| Coze | Open WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Redaktionswertung | 4.3 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Preis | $9/mo | Free |
| Preisspanne | Under $10/mo | Free |
| Kostenloser Tarif | Ja | Ja |
| Preisdetails | Free tier (10 credits/day, 3 bots); Premium from $9/mo (Lite) to $39/mo. Open-source Studio for self-hosting. | Free and open-source; self-host via Docker/pip. An enterprise tier exists but consumer use is free. |
| Inhalte für Erwachsene | No adult mode | No adult mode |
| Sprache | Nein | Sprachnachrichten |
| Bilder | Ja | Ja |
| Video | Nein | Nein |
| Gedächtnis | Ja | Ja |
| Eigene Charaktere | Ja | Ja |
| Begleiter-Typen | Any character | Any character |
| Plattformen | Web | Web |
| Läuft lokal | Nein | Ja |
Coze — unsere Einschätzung
Build and ship custom AI chatbots to 8+ channels with plugins and workflows — a create-your-own toolkit, not a fixed companion.
- No-code bot building
- Multi-channel publishing
- Free tier is usable
Open WebUI — unsere Einschätzung
The power-user pick: run any model locally or in the cloud with zero data retention and full control.
- Zero data retention when self-hosted
- Any model via Ollama/OpenAI-compatible APIs
- Huge community sharing prompts and tools
Coze vs Open WebUI — häufige Fragen
Which is cheaper, Coze or Open WebUI?
Open WebUI is the cheaper of the two at Free, against $9/mo for Coze.
Which one has a free tier?
Both do — you can try either without paying.
Which remembers conversations better?
Both keep context across sessions. The practical difference is elsewhere: price and platform coverage differ between them.
Which handles adult content differently?
Coze: No adult mode. Open WebUI: No adult mode. This directory is SFW — we record whether a mature mode exists so you know before signing up, and we describe no explicit material.