Home / Comparar

Coze vs Open WebUI

Coze edges Open WebUI on our editorial score (4.3 vs 4.2), but Open WebUI is the better fit if you want voice notes; Coze has no clear edge there.

Visitar Coze ↗ ↗Visitar Open WebUI ↗ ↗
CozeOpen WebUI
Nota editorial4.3 / 54.2 / 5
Preço$9/moFree
Faixa de preçoUnder $10/moFree
Plano gratuitoSimSim
Detalhe do preçoFree tier (10 credits/day, 3 bots); Premium from $9/mo (Lite) to $39/mo. Open-source Studio for self-hosting.Free and open-source; self-host via Docker/pip. An enterprise tier exists but consumer use is free.
Conteúdo adultoNo adult modeNo adult mode
VozNãoMensagens de voz
ImagensSimSim
VídeoNãoNão
MemóriaSimSim
Personagens personalizadosSimSim
Tipos de acompanhanteAny characterAny character
PlataformasWebWeb
Roda localmenteNãoSim

Coze — nossa análise

Build and ship custom AI chatbots to 8+ channels with plugins and workflows — a create-your-own toolkit, not a fixed companion.

  • No-code bot building
  • Multi-channel publishing
  • Free tier is usable

Open WebUI — nossa análise

The power-user pick: run any model locally or in the cloud with zero data retention and full control.

  • Zero data retention when self-hosted
  • Any model via Ollama/OpenAI-compatible APIs
  • Huge community sharing prompts and tools

Coze vs Open WebUI — perguntas frequentes

Which is cheaper, Coze or Open WebUI?

Open WebUI is the cheaper of the two at Free, against $9/mo for Coze.

Which one has a free tier?

Both do — you can try either without paying.

Which remembers conversations better?

Both keep context across sessions. The practical difference is elsewhere: price and platform coverage differ between them.

Which handles adult content differently?

Coze: No adult mode. Open WebUI: No adult mode. This directory is SFW — we record whether a mature mode exists so you know before signing up, and we describe no explicit material.

Os preços mudam. Confira o preço atual e os planos disponíveis em cada site antes de assinar. Divulgação de afiliados.