Home / Vergleichen

DeepSeek vs Open WebUI

DeepSeek edges Open WebUI on our editorial score (4.3 vs 4.2), but Open WebUI is the better fit if you want voice notes and image sharing and custom characters; DeepSeek has no clear edge there.

DeepSeek besuchen ↗ ↗Open WebUI besuchen ↗ ↗
DeepSeekOpen WebUI
Redaktionswertung4.3 / 54.2 / 5
PreisFreeFree
PreisspanneFreeFree
Kostenloser TarifJaJa
PreisdetailsFree to use; API billed per token (DeepSeek-V4-Flash ~$0.15-$0.60 per 1M tokens).Free and open-source; self-host via Docker/pip. An enterprise tier exists but consumer use is free.
Inhalte für ErwachseneNo adult modeNo adult mode
SpracheNeinSprachnachrichten
BilderNeinJa
VideoNeinNein
GedächtnisJaJa
Eigene CharaktereNeinJa
Begleiter-TypenAny characterAny character
PlattformenWeb, iOS, AndroidWeb
Läuft lokalNeinJa

DeepSeek — unsere Einschätzung

Not a companion, but its free, capable chat and long memory make it a credible daily AI friend.

  • Free with no usage cap
  • Strong reasoning and coding
  • Long conversation memory

Open WebUI — unsere Einschätzung

The power-user pick: run any model locally or in the cloud with zero data retention and full control.

  • Zero data retention when self-hosted
  • Any model via Ollama/OpenAI-compatible APIs
  • Huge community sharing prompts and tools

DeepSeek vs Open WebUI — häufige Fragen

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek or Open WebUI?

They cost the same on our recorded numbers (Free).

Which one has a free tier?

Both do — you can try either without paying.

Which remembers conversations better?

Both keep context across sessions. The practical difference is elsewhere: price and platform coverage differ between them.

Which handles adult content differently?

DeepSeek: No adult mode. Open WebUI: No adult mode. This directory is SFW — we record whether a mature mode exists so you know before signing up, and we describe no explicit material.

Preise ändern sich. Prüf vor dem Abonnieren den aktuellen Preis und die verfügbaren Tarife auf jeder Seite. Affiliate-Offenlegung.