Home / 비교
DeepSeek vs Open WebUI
DeepSeek edges Open WebUI on our editorial score (4.3 vs 4.2), but Open WebUI is the better fit if you want voice notes and image sharing and custom characters; DeepSeek has no clear edge there.
0| DeepSeek0 | Open WebUI0 | |
|---|---|---|
| 편집 점수 | 4.3 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| 가격 | Free | Free |
| 가격대 | Free | Free |
| 무료 플랜 | 예 | 예 |
| 가격 상세 | Free to use; API billed per token (DeepSeek-V4-Flash ~$0.15-$0.60 per 1M tokens). | Free and open-source; self-host via Docker/pip. An enterprise tier exists but consumer use is free. |
| 성인 콘텐츠 | No adult mode | No adult mode |
| 음성 | 아니오 | 음성 메시지 |
| 이미지 | 아니오 | 예 |
| 동영상 | 아니오 | 아니오 |
| 기억 | 예 | 예 |
| 커스텀 캐릭터 | 아니오 | 예 |
| 컴패니언 유형 | Any character | Any character |
| 플랫폼 | Web, iOS, Android | Web |
| 로컬 실행 | 아니오 | 예 |
DeepSeek — 우리의 견해
Not a companion, but its free, capable chat and long memory make it a credible daily AI friend.
- Free with no usage cap
- Strong reasoning and coding
- Long conversation memory
Open WebUI — 우리의 견해
The power-user pick: run any model locally or in the cloud with zero data retention and full control.
- Zero data retention when self-hosted
- Any model via Ollama/OpenAI-compatible APIs
- Huge community sharing prompts and tools
DeepSeek vs Open WebUI — 자주 묻는 질문
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek or Open WebUI?
They cost the same on our recorded numbers (Free).
Which one has a free tier?
Both do — you can try either without paying.
Which remembers conversations better?
Both keep context across sessions. The practical difference is elsewhere: price and platform coverage differ between them.
Which handles adult content differently?
DeepSeek: No adult mode. Open WebUI: No adult mode. This directory is SFW — we record whether a mature mode exists so you know before signing up, and we describe no explicit material.