Home / Vergleichen
Ollama vs Open WebUI
Ollama edges Open WebUI on our editorial score (4.3 vs 4.2), but Open WebUI is the better fit if you want voice notes and long-term memory and image sharing; Ollama has no clear edge there.
| Ollama | Open WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Redaktionswertung | 4.3 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Preis | Free | Free |
| Preisspanne | Free | Free |
| Kostenloser Tarif | Ja | Ja |
| Preisdetails | Free and open-source (2026-09-30). | Free and open-source; self-host via Docker/pip. An enterprise tier exists but consumer use is free. |
| Inhalte für Erwachsene | No adult mode | No adult mode |
| Sprache | Nein | Sprachnachrichten |
| Bilder | Nein | Ja |
| Video | Nein | Nein |
| Gedächtnis | Nein | Ja |
| Eigene Charaktere | Ja | Ja |
| Begleiter-Typen | Any character | Any character |
| Plattformen | Desktop | Web |
| Läuft lokal | Nein | Ja |
Ollama — unsere Einschätzung
The de-facto local model runtime: one command to run open models, free and open-source.
- One-command model setup
- Huge model library
- Open-source and free
Open WebUI — unsere Einschätzung
The power-user pick: run any model locally or in the cloud with zero data retention and full control.
- Zero data retention when self-hosted
- Any model via Ollama/OpenAI-compatible APIs
- Huge community sharing prompts and tools
Ollama vs Open WebUI — häufige Fragen
Which is cheaper, Ollama or Open WebUI?
They cost the same on our recorded numbers (Free).
Which one has a free tier?
Both do — you can try either without paying.
Which remembers conversations better?
Open WebUI retains context across sessions; Ollama keeps context only within a session.
Which handles adult content differently?
Ollama: No adult mode. Open WebUI: No adult mode. This directory is SFW — we record whether a mature mode exists so you know before signing up, and we describe no explicit material.