Home / Comparar

Ollama vs Open WebUI

Ollama edges Open WebUI on our editorial score (4.3 vs 4.2), but Open WebUI is the better fit if you want voice notes and long-term memory and image sharing; Ollama has no clear edge there.

0
Visitar Ollama ↗ ↗Visitar Open WebUI ↗ ↗
OllamaOpen WebUI
Puntuación editorial4.3 / 54.2 / 5
PrecioFreeFree
Rango de precioFreeFree
Plan gratuitoSíSí
Detalle de precioFree and open-source (2026-09-30).Free and open-source; self-host via Docker/pip. An enterprise tier exists but consumer use is free.
Contenido para adultosNo adult modeNo adult mode
VozNoNotas de voz
ImágenesNoSí
VídeoNoNo
MemoriaNoSí
Personajes personalizadosSíSí
Tipos de compañeroAny characterAny character
PlataformasDesktopWeb
Funciona localmenteNoSí

Ollama — nuestra opinión

The de-facto local model runtime: one command to run open models, free and open-source.

  • One-command model setup
  • Huge model library
  • Open-source and free

Open WebUI — nuestra opinión

The power-user pick: run any model locally or in the cloud with zero data retention and full control.

  • Zero data retention when self-hosted
  • Any model via Ollama/OpenAI-compatible APIs
  • Huge community sharing prompts and tools

Ollama vs Open WebUI — preguntas frecuentes

Which is cheaper, Ollama or Open WebUI?

They cost the same on our recorded numbers (Free).

Which one has a free tier?

Both do — you can try either without paying.

Which remembers conversations better?

Open WebUI retains context across sessions; Ollama keeps context only within a session.

Which handles adult content differently?

Ollama: No adult mode. Open WebUI: No adult mode. This directory is SFW — we record whether a mature mode exists so you know before signing up, and we describe no explicit material.

Los precios cambian. Confirma el precio actual y los planes disponibles en cada sitio antes de suscribirte. Aviso de afiliados.