Home / Comparar

DeepSeek vs Shapes

DeepSeek edges Shapes on our editorial score (4.3 vs 4.0), but Shapes is the better fit if you want custom characters; DeepSeek has no clear edge there.

0
Visitar DeepSeek ↗ ↗Visitar Shapes ↗ ↗
DeepSeek0Shapes0
Puntuación editorial4.3 / 54.0 / 5
PrecioFreeFree
Rango de precioFreeFree
Plan gratuitoSíSí
Detalle de precioFree to use; API billed per token (DeepSeek-V4-Flash ~$0.15-$0.60 per 1M tokens).Core experience free per shapes.inc (2026-09), including model choice and persistent memory; premium models may exist but are not published.
Contenido para adultosNo adult modeNo adult mode
VozNoNo
ImágenesNoNo
VídeoNoNo
MemoriaSíSí
Personajes personalizadosNoSí
Tipos de compañeroAny characterAny character
PlataformasWeb, iOS, AndroidWeb, Discord, Telegram
Funciona localmenteNoNo

DeepSeek — nuestra opinión

Not a companion, but its free, capable chat and long memory make it a credible daily AI friend.

  • Free with no usage cap
  • Strong reasoning and coding
  • Long conversation memory

Shapes — nuestra opinión

A multiplayer twist: add customizable AI characters to Discord, Telegram or the web with persistent memory, free.

  • Lives inside Discord/Telegram
  • 300+ model choice on the free tier
  • Persistent memory

DeepSeek vs Shapes — preguntas frecuentes

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek or Shapes?

They cost the same on our recorded numbers (Free).

Which one has a free tier?

Both do — you can try either without paying.

Which remembers conversations better?

Both keep context across sessions. The practical difference is elsewhere: price and platform coverage differ between them.

Which handles adult content differently?

DeepSeek: No adult mode. Shapes: No adult mode. This directory is SFW — we record whether a mature mode exists so you know before signing up, and we describe no explicit material.

Los precios cambian. Confirma el precio actual y los planes disponibles en cada sitio antes de suscribirte. Aviso de afiliados.