Home / Comparar
Pi vs LobeChat
Pi edges LobeChat on our editorial score (4.0 vs 4.1), but Pi is the stronger pick if you want live voice calls, while LobeChat fits better if voice notes or image sharing or custom characters matter more.
0| Pi0 | LobeChat0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Puntuación editorial | 4.0 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Precio | Free | Free |
| Rango de precio | Free | Free |
| Plan gratuito | Sí | Sí |
| Detalle de precio | Free, with no usage limit and no paid tier — no card required. | Free and open-source (AGPL-3.0); bring your own API keys or local models. A hosted cloud version is in beta without published pricing. |
| Contenido para adultos | No adult mode | No adult mode |
| Voz | Llamadas en vivo | Notas de voz |
| Imágenes | No | Sí |
| Vídeo | No | No |
| Memoria | Sí | Sí |
| Personajes personalizados | No | Sí |
| Tipos de compañero | Any character | Any character |
| Plataformas | Web, iOS, Android | Web, Desktop |
| Funciona localmente | No | Sí |
Pi — nuestra opinión
Completely free, genuinely warm, and no upsell wall. Not a roleplay product, but an excellent listener.
- Entirely free with unlimited voice
- Consistently rated the most empathetic free model
- No ads
LobeChat — nuestra opinión
A serious open-source option: self-host it, plug in any model, and browse community personas — more assistant than romantic partner.
- Fully open-source and self-hostable
- Any model: local or cloud
- Community plugin/persona marketplace
Pi vs LobeChat — preguntas frecuentes
Which is cheaper, Pi or LobeChat?
They cost the same on our recorded numbers (Free).
Which one has a free tier?
Both do — you can try either without paying.
Which remembers conversations better?
Both keep context across sessions. The practical difference is elsewhere: voice support differs between them.
Which handles adult content differently?
Pi: No adult mode. LobeChat: No adult mode. This directory is SFW — we record whether a mature mode exists so you know before signing up, and we describe no explicit material.