Home / Comparar

SillyTavern vs Z.ai

SillyTavern edges Z.ai on our editorial score (4.3 vs 4.1), but SillyTavern is the better fit if you want live voice calls and long-term memory and image sharing and custom characters; Z.ai has no clear edge there.

0
Visitar SillyTavern ↗ ↗Visitar Z.ai ↗ ↗
SillyTavernZ.ai
Puntuación editorial4.3 / 54.1 / 5
PrecioFreeFree
Rango de precioFreeFree
Plan gratuitoSíSí
Detalle de precioFree and open source under AGPL-3.0. You pay only for whichever model API you connect.Web chat is free (checked 2026-09-30); GLM Coding and API plans are priced separately for developers.
Contenido para adultosOptional mature modeNo adult mode
VozLlamadas en vivoNo
ImágenesSíNo
VídeoNoNo
MemoriaSíNo
Personajes personalizadosSíNo
Tipos de compañeroAny characterAny character
PlataformasDesktop, WebWeb
Funciona localmenteSíNo

SillyTavern — nuestra opinión

If you want total control and zero subscription, this is where the advanced users live.

  • Complete control over prompt and memory
  • Works with local or hosted models
  • Free forever

Z.ai — nuestra opinión

A capable free general assistant — the closest free peer to DeepSeek for everyday chat.

  • Free frontier-model chat
  • Fast responses
  • No account friction to try

SillyTavern vs Z.ai — preguntas frecuentes

Which is cheaper, SillyTavern or Z.ai?

They cost the same on our recorded numbers (Free).

Which one has a free tier?

Both do — you can try either without paying.

Which remembers conversations better?

SillyTavern retains context across sessions; Z.ai keeps context only within a session.

Which handles adult content differently?

SillyTavern: Optional mature mode. Z.ai: No adult mode. This directory is SFW — we record whether a mature mode exists so you know before signing up, and we describe no explicit material.

Los precios cambian. Confirma el precio actual y los planes disponibles en cada sitio antes de suscribirte. Aviso de afiliados.