Home / 비교
Character.AI vs Nomi AI
Character.AI edges Nomi AI on our editorial score (4.4 vs 4.2), but the two are close on features — Character.AI is cheaper at $7.92/mo (~$0/mo less), so default to it unless you prefer Nomi AI's branding.
0| Character.AI0 | Nomi AI0 | |
|---|---|---|
| 편집 점수 | 4.4 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| 가격 | $7.92/mo | $8.33/mo |
| 가격대 | Under $10/mo | Under $10/mo |
| 무료 플랜 | 예 | 예 |
| 가격 상세 | c.ai+ $9.99/mo or $94.99/yr (~$7.92/mo). Free chat is unlimited but carries ads, a daily swipe cap and a Charms currency. A cheaper (c.ai) lite tier exists but its price varies by region. | $15.99/mo, $39.99/3mo, or $99.99/yr (~$8.33/mo). Flat, no coins on top. Nomi does not show this on its website — plans appear only inside an account. |
| 성인 콘텐츠 | No adult mode | Optional mature mode |
| 음성 | 라이브 통화 | 라이브 통화 |
| 이미지 | 예 | 예 |
| 동영상 | 아니오 | 아니오 |
| 기억 | 예 | 예 |
| 커스텀 캐릭터 | 예 | 예 |
| 컴패니언 유형 | Any character | Female companion, Male companion, Non-binary |
| 플랫폼 | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android |
| 로컬 실행 | 아니오 | 아니오 |
Character.AI — 우리의 견해
The default starting point: unmatched variety and the most generous free tier in the category.
- 20M+ community characters
- Unlimited free text chat
- Best-in-class prose quality
Nomi AI — 우리의 견해
The memory benchmark. If continuity is your main requirement, this is the one to beat.
- Best long-term memory in the category
- One subscription covers up to 10 companions
- Flat price with no coin top-ups
Character.AI vs Nomi AI — 자주 묻는 질문
Which is cheaper, Character.AI or Nomi AI?
Character.AI is the cheaper of the two at $7.92/mo, against $8.33/mo for Nomi AI.
Which one has a free tier?
Both do — you can try either without paying.
Which remembers conversations better?
Both keep context across sessions. The practical difference is elsewhere: voice support differs between them.
Which handles adult content differently?
Character.AI: No adult mode. Nomi AI: Optional mature mode. This directory is SFW — we record whether a mature mode exists so you know before signing up, and we describe no explicit material.