Home / Vergleichen

Coze vs Inworld

Coze edges Inworld on our editorial score (4.3 vs 4.2), but Coze is the stronger pick if you want image sharing, while Inworld fits better if voice notes matter more.

Coze besuchen ↗ ↗Inworld besuchen ↗ ↗
CozeInworld
Redaktionswertung4.3 / 54.2 / 5
Preis$9/moFree
PreisspanneUnder $10/moFree
Kostenloser TarifJaJa
PreisdetailsFree tier (10 credits/day, 3 bots); Premium from $9/mo (Lite) to $39/mo. Open-source Studio for self-hosting.Free tier (5,000 API interactions/mo, Studio, Unity/Unreal SDK). Pro pay-as-you-go from $0.002/interaction; Creator $25/mo.
Inhalte für ErwachseneNo adult modeNo adult mode
SpracheNeinSprachnachrichten
BilderJaNein
VideoNeinNein
GedächtnisJaJa
Eigene CharaktereJaJa
Begleiter-TypenAny characterAny character
PlattformenWebWeb
Läuft lokalNeinNein

Coze — unsere Einschätzung

Build and ship custom AI chatbots to 8+ channels with plugins and workflows — a create-your-own toolkit, not a fixed companion.

  • No-code bot building
  • Multi-channel publishing
  • Free tier is usable

Inworld — unsere Einschätzung

A developer platform for personality, memory, emotion and voice — build your own interactive characters for games and apps.

  • Deep personality + memory engine
  • Unity/Unreal SDKs
  • Generous free tier

Coze vs Inworld — häufige Fragen

Which is cheaper, Coze or Inworld?

Inworld is the cheaper of the two at Free, against $9/mo for Coze.

Which one has a free tier?

Both do — you can try either without paying.

Which remembers conversations better?

Both keep context across sessions. The practical difference is elsewhere: price and platform coverage differ between them.

Which handles adult content differently?

Coze: No adult mode. Inworld: No adult mode. This directory is SFW — we record whether a mature mode exists so you know before signing up, and we describe no explicit material.

Preise ändern sich. Prüf vor dem Abonnieren den aktuellen Preis und die verfügbaren Tarife auf jeder Seite. Affiliate-Offenlegung.