Home / Comparar

Coze vs Inworld

Coze edges Inworld on our editorial score (4.3 vs 4.2), but Coze is the stronger pick if you want image sharing, while Inworld fits better if voice notes matter more.

Visitar Coze ↗ ↗Visitar Inworld ↗ ↗
CozeInworld
Nota editorial4.3 / 54.2 / 5
Preço$9/moFree
Faixa de preçoUnder $10/moFree
Plano gratuitoSimSim
Detalhe do preçoFree tier (10 credits/day, 3 bots); Premium from $9/mo (Lite) to $39/mo. Open-source Studio for self-hosting.Free tier (5,000 API interactions/mo, Studio, Unity/Unreal SDK). Pro pay-as-you-go from $0.002/interaction; Creator $25/mo.
Conteúdo adultoNo adult modeNo adult mode
VozNãoMensagens de voz
ImagensSimNão
VídeoNãoNão
MemóriaSimSim
Personagens personalizadosSimSim
Tipos de acompanhanteAny characterAny character
PlataformasWebWeb
Roda localmenteNãoNão

Coze — nossa análise

Build and ship custom AI chatbots to 8+ channels with plugins and workflows — a create-your-own toolkit, not a fixed companion.

  • No-code bot building
  • Multi-channel publishing
  • Free tier is usable

Inworld — nossa análise

A developer platform for personality, memory, emotion and voice — build your own interactive characters for games and apps.

  • Deep personality + memory engine
  • Unity/Unreal SDKs
  • Generous free tier

Coze vs Inworld — perguntas frequentes

Which is cheaper, Coze or Inworld?

Inworld is the cheaper of the two at Free, against $9/mo for Coze.

Which one has a free tier?

Both do — you can try either without paying.

Which remembers conversations better?

Both keep context across sessions. The practical difference is elsewhere: price and platform coverage differ between them.

Which handles adult content differently?

Coze: No adult mode. Inworld: No adult mode. This directory is SFW — we record whether a mature mode exists so you know before signing up, and we describe no explicit material.

Os preços mudam. Confira o preço atual e os planos disponíveis em cada site antes de assinar. Divulgação de afiliados.