Home / Compare

Coze vs Sakura FM

Coze edges Sakura FM on our editorial score (4.3 vs 3.9), but Sakura FM is the better fit if you want voice notes; Coze has no clear edge there.

0
Visit Coze ↗ ↗Visit Sakura FM ↗ ↗
Coze0Sakura FM0
Editor score4.3 / 53.9 / 5
Price$9/mo$19/mo
Price bandUnder $10/mo$10–20/mo
Free tierYesYes
Price detailFree tier (10 credits/day, 3 bots); Premium from $9/mo (Lite) to $39/mo. Open-source Studio for self-hosting.Third-party consensus (2026-09): Free tier, Plus $19/mo, Pro $39/mo. Not confirmed on the official site — re-verify before publishing claims.
Adult contentNo adult modeOptional mature mode
VoiceNoVoice notes
ImagesYesYes
VideoNoNo
MemoryYesYes
Custom charactersYesYes
Companion typesAny characterAny character
PlatformsWebWeb
Runs locallyNoNo

Coze — our take

Build and ship custom AI chatbots to 8+ channels with plugins and workflows — a create-your-own toolkit, not a fixed companion.

  • No-code bot building
  • Multi-channel publishing
  • Free tier is usable

Sakura FM — our take

A solid anime-leaning Character.AI alternative with voice and image extras on paid tiers.

  • Large anime character library
  • Voice messages on paid tiers
  • Usable free tier

Coze vs Sakura FM — common questions

Which is cheaper, Coze or Sakura FM?

Coze is the cheaper of the two at $9/mo, against $19/mo for Sakura FM.

Which one has a free tier?

Both do — you can try either without paying.

Which remembers conversations better?

Both keep context across sessions. The practical difference is elsewhere: price and platform coverage differ between them.

Which handles adult content differently?

Coze: No adult mode. Sakura FM: Optional mature mode. This directory is SFW — we record whether a mature mode exists so you know before signing up, and we describe no explicit material.

Prices change. Confirm the current price and available plans on each site before subscribing. Affiliate disclosure.