Home / Compare

DeepSeek vs Kimi

DeepSeek edges Kimi on our editorial score (4.3 vs 4.0), but DeepSeek is the better fit if you want long-term memory; Kimi has no clear edge there.

0
Visit DeepSeek ↗ ↗Visit Kimi ↗ ↗
DeepSeekKimi
Editor score4.3 / 54.0 / 5
PriceFreeFree
Price bandFreeFree
Free tierYesYes
Price detailFree to use; API billed per token (DeepSeek-V4-Flash ~$0.15-$0.60 per 1M tokens).Free web chat; no consumer subscription published (checked 2026-09-30).
Adult contentNo adult modeNo adult mode
VoiceNoNo
ImagesNoNo
VideoNoNo
MemoryYesNo
Custom charactersNoNo
Companion typesAny characterAny character
PlatformsWeb, iOS, AndroidWeb, iOS, Android
Runs locallyNoNo

DeepSeek — our take

Not a companion, but its free, capable chat and long memory make it a credible daily AI friend.

  • Free with no usage cap
  • Strong reasoning and coding
  • Long conversation memory

Kimi — our take

A generous free general assistant from Moonshot; strong on long documents and agentic work.

  • Free with generous limits
  • Strong long-context and document handling
  • iOS and Android apps

DeepSeek vs Kimi — common questions

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek or Kimi?

They cost the same on our recorded numbers (Free).

Which one has a free tier?

Both do — you can try either without paying.

Which remembers conversations better?

DeepSeek retains context across sessions; Kimi keeps context only within a session.

Which handles adult content differently?

DeepSeek: No adult mode. Kimi: No adult mode. This directory is SFW — we record whether a mature mode exists so you know before signing up, and we describe no explicit material.

Prices change. Confirm the current price and available plans on each site before subscribing. Affiliate disclosure.