Home / Compare
DeepSeek vs LobeChat
DeepSeek edges LobeChat on our editorial score (4.3 vs 4.1), but LobeChat is the better fit if you want voice notes and image sharing and custom characters; DeepSeek has no clear edge there.
0| DeepSeek0 | LobeChat0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Editor score | 4.3 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Price | Free | Free |
| Price band | Free | Free |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Price detail | Free to use; API billed per token (DeepSeek-V4-Flash ~$0.15-$0.60 per 1M tokens). | Free and open-source (AGPL-3.0); bring your own API keys or local models. A hosted cloud version is in beta without published pricing. |
| Adult content | No adult mode | No adult mode |
| Voice | No | Voice notes |
| Images | No | Yes |
| Video | No | No |
| Memory | Yes | Yes |
| Custom characters | No | Yes |
| Companion types | Any character | Any character |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, Desktop |
| Runs locally | No | Yes |
DeepSeek — our take
Not a companion, but its free, capable chat and long memory make it a credible daily AI friend.
- Free with no usage cap
- Strong reasoning and coding
- Long conversation memory
LobeChat — our take
A serious open-source option: self-host it, plug in any model, and browse community personas — more assistant than romantic partner.
- Fully open-source and self-hostable
- Any model: local or cloud
- Community plugin/persona marketplace
DeepSeek vs LobeChat — common questions
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek or LobeChat?
They cost the same on our recorded numbers (Free).
Which one has a free tier?
Both do — you can try either without paying.
Which remembers conversations better?
Both keep context across sessions. The practical difference is elsewhere: price and platform coverage differ between them.
Which handles adult content differently?
DeepSeek: No adult mode. LobeChat: No adult mode. This directory is SFW — we record whether a mature mode exists so you know before signing up, and we describe no explicit material.