Home / Compare

SillyTavern vs Open WebUI

SillyTavern edges Open WebUI on our editorial score (4.3 vs 4.2), but SillyTavern is the stronger pick if you want live voice calls, while Open WebUI fits better if voice notes matter more.

0
Visit SillyTavern ↗ ↗Visit Open WebUI ↗ ↗
SillyTavern0Open WebUI0
Editor score4.3 / 54.2 / 5
PriceFreeFree
Price bandFreeFree
Free tierYesYes
Price detailFree and open source under AGPL-3.0. You pay only for whichever model API you connect.Free and open-source; self-host via Docker/pip. An enterprise tier exists but consumer use is free.
Adult contentOptional mature modeNo adult mode
VoiceLive callsVoice notes
ImagesYesYes
VideoNoNo
MemoryYesYes
Custom charactersYesYes
Companion typesAny characterAny character
PlatformsDesktop, WebWeb
Runs locallyYesYes

SillyTavern — our take

If you want total control and zero subscription, this is where the advanced users live.

  • Complete control over prompt and memory
  • Works with local or hosted models
  • Free forever

Open WebUI — our take

The power-user pick: run any model locally or in the cloud with zero data retention and full control.

  • Zero data retention when self-hosted
  • Any model via Ollama/OpenAI-compatible APIs
  • Huge community sharing prompts and tools

SillyTavern vs Open WebUI — common questions

Which is cheaper, SillyTavern or Open WebUI?

They cost the same on our recorded numbers (Free).

Which one has a free tier?

Both do — you can try either without paying.

Which remembers conversations better?

Both keep context across sessions. The practical difference is elsewhere: voice support differs between them.

Which handles adult content differently?

SillyTavern: Optional mature mode. Open WebUI: No adult mode. This directory is SFW — we record whether a mature mode exists so you know before signing up, and we describe no explicit material.

Prices change. Confirm the current price and available plans on each site before subscribing. Affiliate disclosure.