Home / 비교
Coze vs Shapes
Coze edges Shapes on our editorial score (4.3 vs 4.0), but Coze is the better fit if you want image sharing; Shapes has no clear edge there.
0| Coze0 | Shapes0 | |
|---|---|---|
| 편집 점수 | 4.3 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| 가격 | $9/mo | Free |
| 가격대 | Under $10/mo | Free |
| 무료 플랜 | 예 | 예 |
| 가격 상세 | Free tier (10 credits/day, 3 bots); Premium from $9/mo (Lite) to $39/mo. Open-source Studio for self-hosting. | Core experience free per shapes.inc (2026-09), including model choice and persistent memory; premium models may exist but are not published. |
| 성인 콘텐츠 | No adult mode | No adult mode |
| 음성 | 아니오 | 아니오 |
| 이미지 | 예 | 아니오 |
| 동영상 | 아니오 | 아니오 |
| 기억 | 예 | 예 |
| 커스텀 캐릭터 | 예 | 예 |
| 컴패니언 유형 | Any character | Any character |
| 플랫폼 | Web | Web, Discord, Telegram |
| 로컬 실행 | 아니오 | 아니오 |
Coze — 우리의 견해
Build and ship custom AI chatbots to 8+ channels with plugins and workflows — a create-your-own toolkit, not a fixed companion.
- No-code bot building
- Multi-channel publishing
- Free tier is usable
Shapes — 우리의 견해
A multiplayer twist: add customizable AI characters to Discord, Telegram or the web with persistent memory, free.
- Lives inside Discord/Telegram
- 300+ model choice on the free tier
- Persistent memory
Coze vs Shapes — 자주 묻는 질문
Which is cheaper, Coze or Shapes?
Shapes is the cheaper of the two at Free, against $9/mo for Coze.
Which one has a free tier?
Both do — you can try either without paying.
Which remembers conversations better?
Both keep context across sessions. The practical difference is elsewhere: price and platform coverage differ between them.
Which handles adult content differently?
Coze: No adult mode. Shapes: No adult mode. This directory is SFW — we record whether a mature mode exists so you know before signing up, and we describe no explicit material.