Home / Compare

Coze vs Shapes

Coze edges Shapes on our editorial score (4.3 vs 4.0), but Coze is the better fit if you want image sharing; Shapes has no clear edge there.

0
Visit Coze ↗ ↗Visit Shapes ↗ ↗
Coze0Shapes0
Editor score4.3 / 54.0 / 5
Price$9/moFree
Price bandUnder $10/moFree
Free tierYesYes
Price detailFree tier (10 credits/day, 3 bots); Premium from $9/mo (Lite) to $39/mo. Open-source Studio for self-hosting.Core experience free per shapes.inc (2026-09), including model choice and persistent memory; premium models may exist but are not published.
Adult contentNo adult modeNo adult mode
VoiceNoNo
ImagesYesNo
VideoNoNo
MemoryYesYes
Custom charactersYesYes
Companion typesAny characterAny character
PlatformsWebWeb, Discord, Telegram
Runs locallyNoNo

Coze — our take

Build and ship custom AI chatbots to 8+ channels with plugins and workflows — a create-your-own toolkit, not a fixed companion.

  • No-code bot building
  • Multi-channel publishing
  • Free tier is usable

Shapes — our take

A multiplayer twist: add customizable AI characters to Discord, Telegram or the web with persistent memory, free.

  • Lives inside Discord/Telegram
  • 300+ model choice on the free tier
  • Persistent memory

Coze vs Shapes — common questions

Which is cheaper, Coze or Shapes?

Shapes is the cheaper of the two at Free, against $9/mo for Coze.

Which one has a free tier?

Both do — you can try either without paying.

Which remembers conversations better?

Both keep context across sessions. The practical difference is elsewhere: price and platform coverage differ between them.

Which handles adult content differently?

Coze: No adult mode. Shapes: No adult mode. This directory is SFW — we record whether a mature mode exists so you know before signing up, and we describe no explicit material.

Prices change. Confirm the current price and available plans on each site before subscribing. Affiliate disclosure.