Home / Comparar

Pi vs LobeChat

Pi edges LobeChat on our editorial score (4.0 vs 4.1), but Pi is the stronger pick if you want live voice calls, while LobeChat fits better if voice notes or image sharing or custom characters matter more.

Visitar Pi ↗ ↗Visitar LobeChat ↗ ↗
PiLobeChat
Nota editorial4.0 / 54.1 / 5
PreçoFreeFree
Faixa de preçoFreeFree
Plano gratuitoSimSim
Detalhe do preçoFree, with no usage limit and no paid tier — no card required.Free and open-source (AGPL-3.0); bring your own API keys or local models. A hosted cloud version is in beta without published pricing.
Conteúdo adultoNo adult modeNo adult mode
VozChamadas ao vivoMensagens de voz
ImagensNãoSim
VídeoNãoNão
MemóriaSimSim
Personagens personalizadosNãoSim
Tipos de acompanhanteAny characterAny character
PlataformasWeb, iOS, AndroidWeb, Desktop
Roda localmenteNãoSim

Pi — nossa análise

Completely free, genuinely warm, and no upsell wall. Not a roleplay product, but an excellent listener.

  • Entirely free with unlimited voice
  • Consistently rated the most empathetic free model
  • No ads

LobeChat — nossa análise

A serious open-source option: self-host it, plug in any model, and browse community personas — more assistant than romantic partner.

  • Fully open-source and self-hostable
  • Any model: local or cloud
  • Community plugin/persona marketplace

Pi vs LobeChat — perguntas frequentes

Which is cheaper, Pi or LobeChat?

They cost the same on our recorded numbers (Free).

Which one has a free tier?

Both do — you can try either without paying.

Which remembers conversations better?

Both keep context across sessions. The practical difference is elsewhere: voice support differs between them.

Which handles adult content differently?

Pi: No adult mode. LobeChat: No adult mode. This directory is SFW — we record whether a mature mode exists so you know before signing up, and we describe no explicit material.

Os preços mudam. Confira o preço atual e os planos disponíveis em cada site antes de assinar. Divulgação de afiliados.