Home / Comparar

SillyTavern vs Z.ai

SillyTavern edges Z.ai on our editorial score (4.3 vs 4.1), but SillyTavern is the better fit if you want live voice calls and long-term memory and image sharing and custom characters; Z.ai has no clear edge there.

Visitar SillyTavern ↗ ↗Visitar Z.ai ↗ ↗
SillyTavernZ.ai
Nota editorial4.3 / 54.1 / 5
PreçoFreeFree
Faixa de preçoFreeFree
Plano gratuitoSimSim
Detalhe do preçoFree and open source under AGPL-3.0. You pay only for whichever model API you connect.Web chat is free (checked 2026-09-30); GLM Coding and API plans are priced separately for developers.
Conteúdo adultoOptional mature modeNo adult mode
VozChamadas ao vivoNão
ImagensSimNão
VídeoNãoNão
MemóriaSimNão
Personagens personalizadosSimNão
Tipos de acompanhanteAny characterAny character
PlataformasDesktop, WebWeb
Roda localmenteSimNão

SillyTavern — nossa análise

If you want total control and zero subscription, this is where the advanced users live.

  • Complete control over prompt and memory
  • Works with local or hosted models
  • Free forever

Z.ai — nossa análise

A capable free general assistant — the closest free peer to DeepSeek for everyday chat.

  • Free frontier-model chat
  • Fast responses
  • No account friction to try

SillyTavern vs Z.ai — perguntas frequentes

Which is cheaper, SillyTavern or Z.ai?

They cost the same on our recorded numbers (Free).

Which one has a free tier?

Both do — you can try either without paying.

Which remembers conversations better?

SillyTavern retains context across sessions; Z.ai keeps context only within a session.

Which handles adult content differently?

SillyTavern: Optional mature mode. Z.ai: No adult mode. This directory is SFW — we record whether a mature mode exists so you know before signing up, and we describe no explicit material.

Os preços mudam. Confira o preço atual e os planos disponíveis em cada site antes de assinar. Divulgação de afiliados.